THATTA CEMENT COMPANY EMPLOYEES UNION THROUGH GENERAL SECRETARY versus REGISTRAR TRADE UNIONS, HYDERABAD REGION
Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan Article, Article 199 Constitutional Race Judiciary, Applicable Trade Union Registration Applicable Trade Union Respondents He was attacked before the trade union registration. In the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, a similar application filed by the High Court, the employer company had already been dismissed, by the Registrar, the effect of the grant of certificates in relation to the respondent trade unions, the trade unions excluded the constitutional application And the appeal retained on appeal was also rejected, therefore, the grant of registration cannot be revoked nor can it be set aside by the High Court in the subsequent petition, in particular. When there is no unusual circumstance or justification to reverse / reverse such an earlier decision. Was. The doctrine of contradictory finding on the same subject cannot be commenced in the constitutional jurisdiction, since it may be practiced in the ordinary jurisdiction, therefore, in this case no new inquiry can be elaborated on recording the evidence, etc. This was already the reason, given the decision in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction before. The High Court, which had committed the same parties, refused to repeat, especially when the general principles of Res Judesta were also attracted to this petition.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
