Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 conviction, two-day delay in filing a marital dispute FIR, which was not specified by the prosecution. No recovery was effective. The FIR suspects have revealed that the accused were the deceased's ex-father and ex-brother, respectively, the prosecution witness, who was sleeping beside the victim at the time of his murder, stated in his statement under Section 161, CR PC The accused was charged with murder with aggravated faces and four days delay was not specified in the inspection site of the adviser. The incident was not submitted to the police, but the complaining party submitted them. Who handed them over. Police had brought the body of the deceased to the hospital on the day of the incident, therefore, it can be said that the incident was precisely the information about e-police and the complaining party, but still two days after the incident, the FI The R was filed which was followed by suspicion and further investigation was required as under Section 497 (2), the CCP bail application was accepted and they were entered. To guarantee
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
