Find a Lawyer

GUL REHMAN ALIAS GUL MUSLIM versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 392/395/34 burglary, burglary, joint intent bail, further investigation grant neither the name of any accused was mentioned in the FIR, and Neither has the details of any of the accused been mentioned. It has been revealed from the contents of the FIR that the security guards had blindfolded them and did not know in which car the accused persons came and they committed the crime. Had committed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. v. KHAIRPUR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED 2012 CLD 1136
• LIAQAT v. State 2012 YLR 1138
• AURANGZAIB IQBAL v. State 2012 YLR 1141
• AHMED ALI v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1145
• FEROZE KHAN v. State 2012 MLD 1152
• Mst. MEHRUN NISA v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, (Education), Government of Sindh 2012 PLC(CS) 1161
• SAUD HUSSAIN v. State 2012 YLR 1161
• ABDULLAH v. State 2012 MLD 1171

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocates phone number from Chak 4 b c lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes