PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. versus KHAIRPUR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
Sections 18 and 19 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXIII, R 3, Sections 2 (2) and 12 (2) are to be set aside by the contracting parties and the compromise decree. If a deal is successfully ruled out by a court then it almost always fails, but it is not possible to challenge a contract, so it is not necessary to challenge one contract with another. The contract and the contract are one-sided. Others may be attacked by decrees, but nevertheless, they are different. It may be that as a matter of form, the challenge has been referred to the decree and the challenge of the material has to be carefully reviewed and the difference between the decree and the agreement has to be taken into account if a compromise is made on the basis of misrepresentation. If the governing matter is challenged, it is important to be clear, whether the attack was made against a contract or decree or a compromise agreement is merely an agreement and can be falsified on the basis of false statements, The matter falls within the purview of sections 18 and 19 of the Contract Act, 1872, on the other hand, may be set aside under section 12 (2), CPC. You have
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
