The legal delay in adjudication of section 426 (1A) (C) sentence appeal has been more than two and a half years since the accused and the accused had filed their appeals and their position was that the delay was not their cause. ? Acknowledged that the report of the accused and the co-accused by the jail authorities was not delayed and stated that the accused and the co-accused had not been convicted in any other case before and while in jail, The conduct of the accused was satisfactory under the section of the accused. 426 (1A) (c), the CCP, was free from its right to suspend its sentence by the appellate court on the merits, so that such right may be exercised by the accused, despite the fact that the appellant. The court may use it at its discretion. Earlier, under bail 426, the bail on merit was rejected, CRPC suspended the accused and co-accused, under circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
