MALIK SOHAIL KHAN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH, LAND UTILIZATION DEPARTMENT
Sections 10 and 24 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 and 2 of the Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 39, 42 and 54 of Documents, Declarations and Orders, Interim Orders, Violations, Grants of Violation The terms of the lease case for the leasehold rights were granted to the plaintiff on the lease but it was canceled by the plaintiff in violation of the terms of the lease agreement that the plaintiff had raised by the plaintiff It was valid with him in the history of the possession of the prized possession. The Prima facie order, under which the plaintiff's land was resumed, was tainted by material misconduct and herein violated section 24 of the Constitution of the Government Offices (Punjab) Colony Act, 1912, The defendants claimed that they claim and use them on their behalf. The land was also open to a serious question and it is suspected that all transactions suffered from illicit and illicit use and it appears that the relevant provisions of the colonies of the Government were the Tlands (Punjab) Act, 1912 and its The terms set out under the Terms were excluded from the documentation and relied upon by the defendants themselves. Their separate responsibility lies on the record that the case is at least sufficiently settled to the extent that the claim was made by the claimant. Introduced a case for interim relief because it was illegally denied the land on which it was entitled under the leasehold rights. The land could be in the hands of other people, who were putting it to use. Which can make it plain to the claimant and vice versa. The balance of convenience in the law was in favor of the plaintiff
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
