Articles 340 and 526 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 320/504/147/148/149, the jurisdiction to change their lawyer to transfer the case was that the trial court is prosecuting the matter. ? In a hurry; the trial court's request for more time to add another lawyer was rejected. That the defendants were not satisfied with their lawyer and have the right to engage with another lawyer of their choice under Section 404040, CRPC, and the trial court prosecuted several attorneys through litigation. The right to investigate the prosecution witnesses of the accused represented was discontinued. The suspects and their cause were on the record, but no one heard the defendant's statement on his behalf. The trial had to proceed and conclude in a reasonable time, and neither party could be allowed to delay the proceedings without a reasonable excuse. The individuals were given many opportunities to proceed to trial and their attempt to change their lawyer was an attempt to delay the proceedings, which was not in accordance with section 4040, CRPC alleges. It was imposed to find a cure accordingly. Laws If they felt they had suffered prejudice by any order of the trial court, no good reason was shown for transferring the present case from the trial court to another court, transferring the case to the court. Request dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
