Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302 / 337H (2) / 34 affected by murder, beating or negligence; The complainant's son was murdered, saying that neither his name was mentioned in the FIR nor his characteristics or details were mentioned in it. Although the accused was previously known to the complainant, he did not mention his name in the FIR despite the fact. That the accused was involved in the statements of the prosecution witnesses listed under Section 161, CCPC. That a prosecution witness did not disclose the name of the accused in his statement, under section 160, CR PC. That is, the testimony of another prosecutor, who stated in his statement under Section 1164, CR PC, that all the accused were friends of his deceased brother, but did not disclose their names for too long; that section 161 There was a delay of at least 15 days in recording the statements under CCP authenticity, neither the names of the accused in the FIR were mentioned nor any details provided, under which section 161, C.R. The statements of the prosecution witnesses were recorded under the PC. The unequivocal delay of approximately 15 days, the first time the names of the accused were disclosed, cannot be ruled out as the possibility of false involvement / involvement of the accused. The charges against the accused were confirmed by prosecution witnesses over ineffective aerial shootings. In examining them they knew the accused, but despite the fact they waited a long time to trap them and police had to wait till the statements were made under section 161.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
