Section 497 (2) bail, accused of further investigation against the accused, was robbed at a petrol station and taken away cash and property. There were allegations from the accused that they were not named in the FIR, and they were arrested. There was another case, and the contents of the FIR revealed that they had been kept at the Intelligence Center before being involved in the crime of the incident, and no one has been identified for the incident. Was not made and it was clearly stated that the perpetrators of the robbery were not known. Several days after his arrest, the identity parade of the suspects was held. Some intelligence information about the information obtained from the incident was allegedly obtained by the investigating officer, who had been identified before the accused's arrest. Had obtained permission to hold the parade. It may be that the identity parade of the accused was tarnished by the fact that the accused was shown to the complainant and other witnesses, while they were in the lockup case, they needed further investigation. Was gone and they were guaranteed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
