Section 9 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 212 (2) of the Constitution, challenged the transfer of maternity petitioners from one place to another. Constitutional jurisdiction may be provided if no other appropriate remedy is provided by law, whereas in the present case, as a applicant public servant, the posting / transfer of the employee of the Government under the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 The scope of the question came under the jurisdiction. The competent authority applicants had the alternative constitutional jurisdiction available under Section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, therefore, it cannot be empowered to say that after resolving Article 212 (2) of the Constitution, all other courts Jurisdiction was excluded. The departmental authority, whether unlawfully or illegally, may be challenged only under the provisions of section 9 of the E-Service Tribunal Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, within the province of a civil servant or He was obliged to serve anywhere outside, no provincial or federal government official could hold any document on record. In order to show that the applicant's non-transferable transfer orders were approved under political influence, there was no fundamental right with respect to the posting, exchange or promotion of public servants, so any constitutional right The question of violation did not arise, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
