A preliminary injunction for the distribution of the AXXVI, R 13 and Section 97 suits was reached, after which a local commission was appointed, before which the parties agreed, and a final order was passed by the trial court, in which the appellate court defendants. Ali's reasoning was maintained. Was it that he was not willing to compromise and the disputed property was already divided? The dispute of legitimacy was that the property had already been distributed. Could have been. The fact is that the defendant did not break the preliminary ruling party in the partition case; if he did not comply with the preliminary injunction, in view of section 97 of the CPC, he could not claim that the property was divided. Not default or as the shares were not valid in the initial decree or private distribution has already taken place the plaintiff was not aggravated at any stage that he was not previously sent at the time of action by the local commission. And it agreed to the proposed distribution procedure adopted by the courts above which it was permissible The look has been revised down
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
