Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Sub-Maturity Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) drug borderline bail case possession, refusal of the accused to be a former offender and severe criminal impact against the accused were his possession. 1200 grams of hashish was recovered from it. The conviction was that the alleged drug was restored. That no independent witness was associated with the recovery process. That the police did not need the accused for further investigation, and this was a borderline case which alleged that 1200 grams of hashish was recovered from the possession of the accused, of which 10 grams were dispatched. For the chemical inspector's analysis of which was a positive offense under Section 9 (c) of the Reporting Drug Substances Act, 1997, the scope of the prohibition clause of section 497 came before CRPC 58 Was involved in criminal cases, out of which 28 resulted in his conviction, therefore, he could be declared the hardest offender even though the accused was convicted in connection with drug offenders. There was no previous conviction, but because of his previous conduct, other criminal cases and his involvement in the offenses, he was not entitled to anyone. Bail Exemption Based on the fact that the present case was a border line case, the accused's request bail was dropped, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
