DR. SAIMA MALIK versus CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, LAHORE
Section 491 before the Guardian Judge for the custody of the minor effect agreement between the Guardian and Wards Act (VII VI of 1890), the Section 25 Habitat Corps application for the recovery of the minor, the minor's mother (applicant) and the father (defendant). The request is pending. The father took the minor from his mother and refused to return it and filed an application under section 25 of the Parent-Administered and Ward Act, 1890, the mother's statement stated that the minor was in accordance with their contract. The father was handed over he did not return the minor, which was a breach of contract. That the minor was not in proper custody, and that he had the right to have a minor dispute that the mother had relinquished her right to the custody of the minor, and that the guardian judge had directed the minor. Should not be removed from the father illegally, without coercion and without law, due to an agreement between the parties, the legal status shows that the minor was in the custody of the mother but the father was given the rights of meeting, The father took the minor from his mother and never returned it, violating the terms of his residence and contract, The Father moved the petition under section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, that since the matter was pending before the Guardian Judge, therefore, the present petition was unable to be sustained, leading to a misunderstanding when the minor father at the time was concerned. Was not required to file a petition before the Guardian Judge, so it was clear that he did not withdraw from the Guardian Court. Guard under Section 1, 1, CRPC
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
