Section 302 (b) / 34 Qtl e amd Definition of Shared Intent Evidence Delay in reporting the incident to the police, which occurred near the witnesses' home, who was the inmate of the house, was the natural witness to the presence. This place was quite natural at the relevant time. His evidence was straightforward and influenced by trust Medical evidence supported the ocular account presented by the complainant and the prosecutor's witness doctor, although a lawyer's cross-examination was performed, but some of the suspect's It was not possible to be brought on record during the interim inspection process. The recovery of the pistol further confirmed the prosecution's case against the accused, which was recovered at his indication, that the pistol was sent to the forensic science laboratory and it was said that there was positive evidence of the laboratory. Pistol retrieval and forensic science laboratory's positive report exposed the prosecution's case against the accused Moto, who did not prove, could not be used against the defendants, because the statements of defense witnesses were not reliable. There was a resident of the place who was away from the scene. One of the defense witnesses was the witness, who did not explain any reason for his presence at the scene. The defense evidence presented by the accused was not dependable. The defendant was not helpful even if he was excluded from considering the evidence of the motive There was sufficient evidence of infringement, that is available on record about the prosecution case, the defendant's and the prosecutor's testimony fully established to the extent of the accused by the prosecution's evidence.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
