Section 2302 (b) / Q 34 Defendant's testimony was not based on the facts of the case, the prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence. There was an extra-judicial confession, which went to the accused himself. He said that there is no social status of witnesses which could indicate the accused to confess before them, but the civil and criminal proceedings between his family are still pending, so the additional judicial confession mentioned above. Can't be done. In the absence of any free association, the police recovered some contradictory articles from the example of the accused, even if they were accepted as valid, so they did not link them to the commission of the crime, I could not prove that the accused was due to injuries and not even in the hands of one of the accused will not help the prosecutor, as the duration of the injuries and the thing with which was the same reason, the medical report I did not mention the victim's mother, who lived in the confessional house and was the most important and natural witness. For this purpose, was not presented to the court, which gave rise to a negative impression against the prosecution, the accused was acquitted in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
