Section 2 (2 (b) conviction of the testimony of the accused, the reduction in the FIR was immediately recorded without delay, which advised the accused on the same charge as the accused). Dismissed the possibility of deliberation or trial.The deceased's father was fully supportive of the prosecution version stated in the FIR Complainant, although he was closely related to the deceased's father, but only witnesses With close ties and convictions, it was not enough for them to be interested witnesses, except for the real culprit. Failure to record any rivalry or misconduct by the complainant, otherwise the replacement of the real culprit was an unusual event where the complainant was the father of the deceased. The house, and the place inside the shared house, showed the simplicity of the time, place and the way this event took place, which made one person attracted to the fact that At the time of the incident, the presence of the locals was quite natural and the injured person was rushed to hospital immediately. Arrived, the evidence of the complainant was confirmed by the medical evidence, which affected the trust and the trial court relied on the recording of the offense against the accused. The smelly land, the prosecution was completely proved, however, could not be proved by evidence of unrecognizable character. The medical evidence produced by the prosecution provided full support to the ocular account, the defense did not
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
