Applicants suing for specific performance of contract for sale of real estate under section 12 claimed the final dismissal decision stated that the trial court's findings below were based on misrepresentation and a lack of evidence and were subject to material misconduct. The validity of the testimony of the witnesses does not indicate that the applicants can prove the seller's contracts legally enforceable or that the documents allegedly executed by professional professionals in the interests of the respondents. Applicants can prove the applicability of the boundary question Alaq had not had any attention to arguments, communicating enough detail on both documentary and oral evidence in the courts. And their conclusions were fully supported by the evidence on record, contradicting the testimony of the witnesses was the material stamp paper which the alleged applicant had purchased was not issued by the stamp vendor. Did not consider that the sale of the suit property was considered. In their presence, nor can they indicate that the possession of the property was given to the forerunner in the interest of the applicants, nothing illegal was found in the decisions of the courts below, the review was excluded.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
