HUDABIYA PAPER MILLS LTD. versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU
Section 10 (a) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 4, 10A, 23, 24 and 199 Constitutional application of illegal and illegal property property The National Accountability Bureau (Bureau) has provided information on various properties. Has captured In pursuit of the conviction by the Anti-Terrorism Court and the Accountability Court, the applicants (relatives of the acquitted accused) were punished by the applicants for the recovery of their property, fine and confiscation of the accused due to the conviction. Was illegal and without legal authority because the applicants could not be forced to surrender their properties simply because of family ties, and also because the bureau's cases exempted the accused. It was in the possession of the real estate that the verbal orders / instructions of the government, which The Bureau of Accuracy between the accused and the federal government, prepared under the agreement entered into the Mojta agreement, submitted that the settlement agreement was with the federal government, however, it failed to appear before the court, a copy of the settlement agreement. The details of its contents, or even more importantly, the legal justification for assuming jurisdiction over the matter when the Bureau of the Bureau did not file a case / reference against the applicants at the time of the oath of the political government in power. Withdrew from the instructions then the applicant's property was forcibly taken over by the property. had gone. And since it was retained without legal authority, which was a clear violation of constitutional guarantees under Articles 4, 10A, 23 and 24 of the Constitution, the properties of the applicants were taken
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
