Section 2 302 (b) appreciates the evidence on the morning of Nature, which was immediately reported to the police, the complainant was the accused's real brother and the victim's son, involved in a false case for the complainant and lied. There was no reason to provide evidence. The prosecution's other witnesses also fully supported the prosecution's version of setting fire to the accused through a 12-bore gun and causing the victim to die, Syed witness was a resident of the same village and the complainant and The accused is not equally connected with both. Medical evidence provided the necessary competence in the ocular account to testify that both the prosecution's witnesses falsely dismissed the prosecution's testimony that the defendant had disclosed and recovered 12 bore guns obtained through a memo. The forensic science laboratory showed that the vacant gun was fired, the suspects recovered what was deemed necessary and confirmed the ocular evidence. It also acknowledged the prosecution's version of the incident and the incident was a cold one. Mehri was killed, the accused was sentenced; in the circumstances, it did not appear harsh and excessive. God was, but in any situation in reducing, it faced a common punishment was fighting any illegal action Umm d e Commission decision affected or weakness of Appeal dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
