Article 302 (b) Conan testimony (10 of 1984), Article 46 Declaration of testimony in the murder Declaration of death Although the prosecution's witnesses were related to the subpoena, no aforementioned idea or misconduct was found by the accused against them. ? The delay in reporting the case to the false witness police was of minor importance, in which case the prosecution proved the prosecution's case through the victim's statement, when it was recorded by the examining doctor, Dr. Through the testimony of what was relevant and acceptable as per Article 46 of their testimony, the 1984 statement of the deceased was related to the cause of his death before the doctor. He said that at the time of the medical examination of the victim, then injured and fully conscious without any body indication, the statement was recorded, which is considered as a declaration of death, no need to ask the victim's death. In support of the declaration of the free association, which was factual and because of its intrinsic value, had to be relied upon with the help of medical evidence, and the court believed and relied on the prosecution. Was able to prove the case. The trial court's decision to bring charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt did not face any illegal or irregularity, error and injustice, but it was legal and merely a trial court This decision was applied to his heart during the decision of the unknown decision. The trial court was upheld, and it was appealed that the verdict was dismissed for lack of any power.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
