Sections 302, 324, 148, 149, 109 and 120B appreciate the evidence of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 murder, attempted murder, murder, mischief, common object, criminal conspiracy, terrorism act. Advantage suspect that the accused was in jail in another criminal case at the time, it was alleged that he resorted to shootings while armed with Kalashnikov, but during interrogation, the complainant admitted that the prosecution All the witnesses of the case were either very closely related to it or at the time of filing a private complaint to the complainant of his brotherhood, he did not assign any specific role to the accused. Rather, there were common allegations against him, including medical evidence and medical legal reports of the injured witnesses. Isolation, in this case, cannot be the basis for maintaining conviction, in which case the possibility of the accused being lied to in this case cannot be ruled out. Chauvin witnesses charged with the conspiracy said they had heard of the conspiracy created by the suspects along with other suspects long before the incident. But despite the fact that there was enmity, none of them chose to disclose that the defendant's conversations with the complaining party facilitated them to take protective measures to defend themselves. The prosecution's witnesses, after deliberations and consultations, later made such statements as the trial court. To conclude that the accused was not bound by the provisions of section 302, PPC, the accused convicted under Section 7 (a) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, similarly when the section 107, sections of the PPC
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
