Find a Lawyer

RASHEED CNG STATION versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

The nature of the Article 89 Ordinance was a temporary constitution by its very nature, and a temporary law was to be distinguished from a permanent law that remained in force for a limited period and ceased to operate without termination after the expiration of that period. The ordinance was enacted and enacted, not an Executive Power Law Illustrative Case Test

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• MUHAMMAD BASHIR v. State 2015 YLR 932
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2015 CLD 933
• WAPDA FIRST SUKUK COMPANY v. NATIONAL FERTILIZER CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. 2015 CLC 934
• KHALID HUSSAIN v. State 2015 MLD 938
• ARSHAD MEHMOOD ANWAR v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2015 YLR 952
• TARIQ MEHMOOD v. ATLAS BANK LTD. 2015 CLD 959
• BHAI KHAN v. State 2015 YLR 959
• ABDUL KHALIQ v. State 2015 PCrLJ 965

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

immigration advocates email from Chilas lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes