WAPDA FIRST SUKUK COMPANY versus NATIONAL FERTILIZER CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
The Secretary 88, A XXXV, Rr 1, 2 and 5 suits issued certificates of Interplayer Scope Plaintiff Company and the defendant purchased 72 certificates which was not manageable. For the purpose of obtaining a judgment from the court, the Interplayer suit was set up which will be paid or delivered to the person and the matter to be self-compensated will be decided by the court in the Interplaner case. ? In connection with a loan, money or other property, whether dynamic or immovable, which was to be paid or remitted, the court of jurisdiction did not declare that the transfer of 72 certificates in favor of another company. Based on the original certificate and said that the certificate holders had purchased the original certificate till the fact of the disputed certificate was conveyed by the NT Court, the two sides would enjoy each other's opponents as the competent court defendant's role. No comments yet on this, he also requested the plaintiff's request to sell and sell the controversial certificate. The refusal was refused to stop when it was discovered that there was fraud. Plaintiff's allegations were made by the plaintiff in the name of the plaintiff that he had set aside the judgment and order passed by the trial court because he had failed to appreciate the facts and the trial was being tried by the trial court. Was sustained and incorrectly rejected. Conditions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
