Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

TANVEER SHAH versus STATE


Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 381A & 411, theft of a car or other motor vehicle, theft of property stolen unlawfully, further investigation against the accused was alleged that the complainant was stolen. The car was recovered, there was no evidence on record to attract the provisions of section 381A, PPC against the defendant, and most often at section 411, the PPC was attracted against the accused. In the other three cases registered against him, the accused was acquitted and was behind bars and no further requirement was required for the purpose of investigation. The crime was not prohibited by Article 7 of7 clause, the RP allowed the accused's request and he was admitted to bail.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Pindi Bhattian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.