SHEHZAD ASIF RAZA versus SPECIAL JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT
Section 23 and 7 of the Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/109/148/149 Constitution of Pakistan, Section 199 Constitutional application for attempted armed riot with deadly weapons, the Anti-Terrorism Court dismissed this request. Under Section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the applicant accused of litigation for transferring the case to a court of common jurisdiction when the party armed with a weapon equipped with a hearing of his arrest After coming out of court, the complainant was attacked. According to the bail plea, six people were injured as a result of the attack and the legs of an affected person were amputated. Courts were closed and lawyers filed a protest strike for the commission of a felony in the court premises, where several people, including advocates, clerks, litigants, court staff and presiding officers, were present in the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997, Only the Anti Terrorism Court was given the jurisdiction to hear cases of firing or explosive use by any device, including a bomb blast in the court premises. Therefore, the Anti-Terrorism Court had exclusive jurisdiction. And he pleaded guilty to transferring the case to the general court Request was rightly dismissed the petition was removed on the
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012