Sections 12, 19 and 39 of the defendant's assets were tried and sentenced in two different cases, which the High Court upheld and the case was presented to the trial court for a new verdict. After the accused was convicted, the appellate court ordered the confiscation of the property after confessing to the accused, its usefulness was terminated by the forcible injunction, after which the anti-narcotic force again told the property owners The trial court issued the order of the trial court without issuing a notice of cause. Seizure of property When the accused's sentence was dismissed before the trial and a new order to sentence the accused was passed, it was imperative for the trial court to follow the procedure provided, especially Narcotic. In section 39 of the Substances Act 1997, if the accused's assets were being confiscated, a detailed inquiry was signed to the satisfaction of the court and also to declare that the possession of counterfeit / material related to the subject matter. Section 12 of the Drugs Act 1997 was violated, obtained or obtained, but the trial court has either Failed to act or failed to deliver to anyone. According to the declaration required under the law, the impounded orders were declared to have been granted without legal powers and unlawful, and were set aside, in the circumstances before the High Court the trial of the assets before the confiscation of the assets. The court was remanded. After adopting all the codic rituals, the accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
