Find a Lawyer

MST. ZARINA MAI versus SAHIBZADA IRSHAD AHMAD ABBASI

The Appellate Court dismissed the Section 42 suit for the declaration of title by the finding of the appellate court that the statement of the two witnesses was not recorded. In fact, it was wrong and said that the trial court claimed that the claimant's claim that the legal owner of the real property owner was legally determined that the plaintiff had properly sued Filed and the case was correct. The court ruled on the defendants' case

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• BADAR MUNEER v. BADAR HASSAN BHARWANA 2012 YLR 1909
• THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, NAB v. MUHAMMAD AYUB 2012 PCrLJ 1911
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE 2012 YLR 1919
• ABDUL SATTAR v. THE STATE through S.-I/S.H.O. 2012 PCrLJ 1924
• NOOR MUHAMMAD v. State 2012 YLR 1927
• MUHAMMAD SAFDAR v. State 2012 MLD 1931
• ASRAR AHMED KHAN v. SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, FAISALABAD 2012 YLR 1938
• RAZIA BIBI v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2012 MLD 1943

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

tax advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes