Sections 302 (b), 397/392 and 411 of attempted murder, death or serious injury to a robbery, fraudulently receiving stolen property were not filed at this time and place as the complainant stated. Rather, it was through counseling and deliberation that the lawsuit was filed and the post-mortem examination of the victim was made after such an unusual delay that the prosecution was not certain about the time of the incident and The other witnesses of the complaint were closely related to the accused and there is no enmity with them. The accused, however, failed to establish his presence at the scene of the incident as witnesses offered to accompany the victim at the time of the incident, and the record was falsified by evidence. And the incident was not reported. As alleged by the prosecution, the incident was acknowledged overnight and the accused was involved in the given situation cannot be identified by the prosecution's witnesses. Ocular evidence was not according to the medical evidence, police did not take any crime on the spot, there was no benefit of recovering carbine from one accused. The result was that they were not used by them during the incidents, the money recovered from the accused was not established during the investigation as the money recovered from them during the incident was badly recovered.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
