Attempts to commit sections 302 (b), 324 and 337 D Qamal Amal, which led to Jifa's appreciation of the evidence which was reported very promptly, were both witnesses to the incident. Permanently explained the style and style of the The weapons used by the suspect and the locations of the wounds on the bodies of the two deceased prosecution witnesses, who suffered severe fire from the suspect's hand, were not suspected of his presence at the scene of the incident. The story of the prosecution is mentioned in TheFLRNR, both witnesses were subjected to cross-examination for a long time, but they were persistent and defense of every material point could not be removed, Which proved fatal to the prosecution or could provide a benefit to the defense. Doubts about their presence at the scene; or making a false statement against the accused was a widespread incident and the two parties were known as having a relative, which led to a misunderstanding. The possibility of identifying the user was denied. The case complainant will not spare the real culprit who committed the murder of his father and a close relative and added the accused without any rhyme or reason, the evidence provided by the two eyewitnesses proved the conviction of the trial court to be a crime. And what about the conviction and the defense failed to break. The credentials of the eyewitnesses proved beyond any doubt in the ocular account presented by both eyewitnesses that the medical evidence substantiated the identity of the wounds.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
