THE STATE THROUGH PROSECUTOR-GENERAL, NAB versus MUHAMMAD AYUB
Sections 12 (c) and 23 How to freeze property Restrictions on transfer of property There is a serious suspicion of property protection under which the order of the company deals with the origin of the transaction under which the accountability court directed that the property be frozen. To be taken, and to be taken notice, was affixed with meaning and effect, provided under Section 12 (c) of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999 in accordance with the methods of freezing immovable property. Capturing; or designating a recipient. Or prohibiting the payment of rent or the delivery of property on behalf of the accused or any other person. Or in any way that the NAB, as deemed appropriate by the Chairman NAB, never intended to impose a simple bansheet lawyer, because at the start of an inquiry or investigation, the ban would automatically become a National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. Was imposed under section 23 of the Act. Another method could be adopted under clause (iv) of section II2 provided under Sections 12 (c) (i) to (iii), so as to protect the property and the interests of the claimants. Prevent the trial court from approving new orders because the court was fully capable of passing appropriate orders in accordance with the provisions of Section 12 (c) of the National Accountability Ordinance, correction / clarification of waiver orders without any tangible content of 1999 , Which was not prohibited under section 36969, is one of the methods set forth in clauses (i) to (iii) of section 12 (c) of CCP trial court clauses (i) to (iii) Could easily have recovered. National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 to protect property from illicit use, to ensure that claimants' rights are protected.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
