ASRAR AHMED KHAN versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, FAISALABAD
Sections 23, 6, 7 and 8 of the Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), section 283/290/291/324/353/435/506/186/148/149 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Public barriers, public disturbance, prejudice Post-mortem, murder, attempt to commit or commit a criminal force, corruption by fire or explosives, criminal threat, obstruction of public servants from performing public duties, disorderly assault with a deadly weapon and illegal assembly. Transfer the application case to a regular court. The Anti-Terrorism Court refused to move the case to a regular court under a controversial order, when weapons-armed men allegedly blocked not only a square, but also fired and stoned police personnel. Surprisingly, none of them had the same injuries to police officers or other district administration personnel at the scene of the incident, the investigating officer could not collect any crime. By chance, ten or eleven unidentified persons have been mentioned by the complainant as the accused has not been brought in the case till date when it falls within the purview of Section 8 (d) (i) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. Was not involved in sectarian hatred. The crime report alleged that the men mentioned were merely and solely terrorists, the strict statements of the case did not attract any provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 The Anti-Terrorism Court is involved, therefore, the plea of the accused under section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 was not justified in dismissing, especially when dealing with the accused's bail plea.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
