Sections 96, 100 and O XLI, R 31 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the components required for the decision of the section 42 suit appellate court were decided by the trial court and the lower appellate court in favor of the defendant. The source had raised that he was inferior. The appellate court did not consider the evidence on record and did not come to an independent conclusion. Verification of the First Appeal The court is bound to deal with all matters, as the first appeal was a valuable right in which both the law and the facts were to be considered and decided. The first appeal was to lure yourself to all matters of law and fact and to decide it by appealing the contentious argument under section 966. The CPC was an absolute right presented by law and was to continue the proceedings, which came fully before the First Appellate Court. At the same time, there is a right to review the claims and evidence, as well as the repetition of the law and the facts, after which the duty was imposed in the lower appellate court for examination and e-examination. Record the relevant issues and then determine the relevant issues. The lower appellate court had to keep martial facts and evidence in both cases of affidavit where the lower appellate court's decision was reversed, the appellate court should consider its relevant and material evidence on record and give reasons. ? Where the verdict was affirmed, it was not necessary to consider every evidence again, but there should be sufficient discussion that the court re-evaluated the facts and circumstances of the case. Was, in the present case, denied by the High Court. Re-evaluation of evidence and its own conclusion
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
