Article 2 302 (b) and at 377 Qatil were charged as just one accused in the morning and the same day the prosecution presented the final evidence, they said that the evidence was very suspicious as no compelling reason was brought to the record. It was because the witness who testified for the last nine months remained silent and on the day of the sudden registration of the case, he made a statement to the police that the witnesses of the extra-judicial confession were very close to the complainant, they were interested witnesses and They were disclosed through other evidence, which they lacked. The case was not the reason for the extra-judicial confession before the witnesses the next day, the alleged extra-judicial confession made by the accused in the FIR post-mortem report of the affected child was denied, The doctor's positive report regarding the sodomy commission on the deceased child is hardly credible, as the scars of the deceased could not be ascertained. The body remained in the canal water for 24 hours and was buried for 42 days and was in critical condition. No articles related to the accused in the murder of the deceased child were recovered from the evidence against the accused. Even insufficient, he was entitled to the benefit of the suspect was acquitted under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
