DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM
O VI R 17 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Amendment to Section 39 Requests Suitable for Claimant's Amendment and consequently Relief Documents for Cancellation of Documents with Relief When the plaintiff's argument was that the suit was filed, he was on suit property but during the temporary status of the suit, he was dismissed, saying that the amendment was justified. Changes the nature or color of the game or presents a new cause for such a new action. The permit could not be granted, and in the present case, the trial court committed surveillance that the plaintiff had not submitted any document to show that by the proposed amendment, he was in possession of the property in dispute with the plaintiff. As a result of the property relief and if such modification is allowed, the suit will be considered as a suit for recovery of occupancy and the proposed amendment will alter the nature of the suit as a result of this matter and proceedings. The basic character of the suit cannot be allowed to be changed, though the plaintiff's proposed amendment was allowed by the High Court keeping the trial court's amendment order aside.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
