MIAN AFTAB A. SHEIKH versus TRUST MODARBA THROUGH TRUST MANAGEMENT SERVICES (PVT.) LTD.
Sections 2 (h), 25, 26 and 28 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 47 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 4 (2) (14), 79, 80 and 81 Money. The decree, the execution of the object petition under section 47, by the CPC decree that the Mudarabah Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to execute such order as arrears of land revenue by the collector. Applicable to the land was a kind of rent levied by the state and payable by the landlord, if the residual amount for the collection of land revenue would be left in West Pakistan Lane. Section 79 of the Revenue Act 1967 provided for the method of collection of land revenue, but not for the collection of undisclosed sums, resulting in a dispute arising out of a contract in the business of such agreement. I was not a party between the two parties as there was no alliance with the state, therefore, the declared amount could not be declared as the land revenue and decision-making act could seek asylum under section to79. As used in Section 5 (1). The cancellation of the Collection by the Moderba Companies and the Moderba (Flotation and Control) Ordinance, 1980 and thereby will indicate that there will be illegal collection by the Tribunal as a residual income for the land, but the Collector Tribunal Section 80 You can use all the options available to the Collector under. The West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 Tribunal, as a civil court, had the authority to enforce its order under OXXVII, CPC or as per the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
