Section 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) was not used even though the convict Amad was sentenced to be armed with a weapon (SOTA) when Lalakara pleaded guilty at the time of the alleged incident. And accused of it. Relationships with crime motives cannot be considered as situations, because the co-offenders were burdened with the punishment, however, a line of discrimination between him and fellow criminals was drawn but fugitives. Being innocent was not the ultimate proof of guilt. One can flee from the fear of retaliation by his opponents or the arrest of police accomplices, who were sentenced to identical prison sentences because the offender, despite his role, acknowledged bail through suspension. had gone. The culprit more than the conviction was suspended, in the circumstances, and accordingly he was released on bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
