ABDUL WAHAB versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, OKARA
Articles 3, 5 and 7 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application Function Offensive based on a patriarchal agreement between the parties in preventing illegal property, investigation and procedure, eviction and recovery process as interim relief. Lucy was (applicant). Lester (defendant), who illegally occupied land on a lease-based land dispute and upon expiry of the contract, filed a complaint against the Ledger under the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005 and the trial court during the trial. The matter was dealt with because it was compromised. Under the terms of the agreement, Lizzie presented to the lender a check that was dishonored and claimed that the leaseholder had violated the terms of the agreement, a trial for restoration of the land. Passed the petition before the Court, whose permission was specifically accepted by the employers of the occupation of the payee, which was valid in the settlement agreement, and it was an admitted fact that the lessee had previously occupied the land. Because in the case of a lease agreement, seizing the lease was not illegal and illegal or was a misdemeanor, regardless of the amount of the lease. The terms of the payment were fixed and the borrower issued checks for payment, consequently the trial court never declared the possession of the advertisement illegal and filed the lease case in the settlement case. After the complaint was settled, no action was pending after the trial court's order to restore the case. Possession, in violation of the terms and conditions of the Agreement,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
