Find a Lawyer

MARKET COMMITTEE, SAHIWAL versus SYED ZAIGHAM ALI

The RIA7A Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the Section 3 intra-court requested the appointment of an unemployed child of an unofficial / disenfranchised civil servant son, in which the committee was instructed to provide for his father Work the place. In clear and unambiguous terms on behalf of the Medical Officer, it is stated that the applicant's father has been disqualified. Will become Only if his father dies while in service or he / she is disqualified / disqualified for further services, his applicant's father may at any time qualify for medical The officer or the head of the department was not declared as ineligible. The department did not act in violation of any law or regulation by not appointing the son of the employee in place of his father.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• BARKAT ALI v. TANVIR ABBAS TABISH 2012 CLC 308
• BILAL v. State 2012 PLD 311
• ABDUL MUNAAF v. State 2012 PCrLJ 311
• Haji MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (INVESTIGATION), LAHORE 2012 PLD 315
• ZIA ULLAH v. State 2012 MLD 319
• MUHAMMAD JAVED IQBAL v. ABDUL LATIF ALVI 2012 PLD 319
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. PARVEEN AKHTAR 2012 CLC 321
• State v. D.P.O., MULTAN 2012 PLD 323

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

ask a advocate free from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes