Section 2 (c) \ user \, ???? service provider \ jurisdiction of the consumer court to grant the jurisdiction of the consumer court, there must be a user must either complain against a manufacturer or service provider. Yes, however, the buyer will resell or be hired. Any commercial purpose was excluded from the definition of \ User of the Complainant for payment of the same turnover on a monthly basis by the complainant, the complainant was not brought in the definition of \ User the had gone. In section 2 (c) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2005, section 2 (c) (ii) of the Act describes \ user defined as a person who has served for consideration. , But in the present case, the payment of each contribution and the equal amount received and the collector monthly, on a monthly basis, did not provide any additional benefit to the complainant in accordance with Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act. Can be termed as "contemplation". , 2005 was not applicable in view of the facts of this case, and was not specifically requested by Sections 21 (c) and (d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2005, as regards certain types, standards or equality of service No representation was made. There was no representation by the fundraiser as well as his / her expertise, abilities or experience in providing the alleged services by the complainant. The complainant's complaint was outside the jurisdiction of the Consumer Court. aside r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
