HAJI MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (INVESTIGATION), LAHORE
Article 156 and 173 of the Police Order [22 of 2002], Article 18 (6) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Article 365 Abduction or Abduction Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Investigation of the Transfer of Inquiry, and it The complainant's complaint was forwarded only to the relevant police authorities on the dishonest investigation board constituted under Article 18 (6) of the Police Order, 2002, which made recommendations for the transfer of the case, and that There were. A criminal matter should have been re-investigated after submitting a final report under Section 737373 by a communication board approved by the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Investigation), if the PC was legally withheld Was not, if any new incident or incident guarantees re-investigation. Or further investigation The conclusion of the criminal trial investigation on Nian (Special Special) was illegal and no such basis was sufficient to pass an order for the investigation and transfer of the investigation to the investigator, especially when the complainant His son was not recovered yet, it was the responsibility of the police officers to investigate and conclude on merit purely and in a lawful sloppy manner. One of the obvious instances of the aggrieved investigating officer was the responsibility of drawing conclusions on Nian, etc., to unveil the truth and collect all the relevant material / evidence in this regard; the controversial order of transfer of investigation was neither inappropriate nor Not only illegal, but it was he who was approved to receive the above items The constitutional petition was rejected in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
