Sections 2 302 (b), 6 436 and 1 381A The murder house, mischief by fire with intent to break the house, benefit of suspicion stealing motor vehicle No evidence available from the neighborhood of the scene by the prosecution was done. It cannot be believed that three unidentified suspects will be awaiting the arrival of prosecution witnesses in his courtyard after the house was set on fire, for the FIR to be registered by the complainant at the police station and at the site of the incident. Evidence of arrival was material non-contradiction Witnesses were not present at the time and place of the incident and they saw the same identity of the accused through the prosecution witnesses in the identification parade, so the incident was anonymous and therefore immoral. And it was revealed. Information about the suspect in the presence of cash and gold jewelery in the house of the deceased, it is not proved that the record was not set up by any account for any purpose or any previous racketeering allegation. In order to set fire to the accused's room and kill him, and the joint extra-judicial confession of the accused was made before the complainant's relatives. A thoughtful, thorough, unreliable and unreliable evidence of a motorcycle recovery case has been dismissed by the complainant and the victim's relatives and is not substantiated by any independent witness in the area. The motorcycle did not show the deceased its owner, the recovery of the pistol from the accused was also unnecessary, as it was not used in the event that my argument also stated that the complainant had to lie against the accused. For the
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
