LIAQAT ALI CHUGTAI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY RAILWAYS
Section 9 (2) (a) Rules of Government Employees (Appointments, Promotions and Conversions), 1973, Articles 7, 7A and 8 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 10A, 14 and 1991 Constitutional Request for the Right to Fair Dignity of Human Dignity Deprecation, etc. Failure to meet the minimum requirement of the aggregate marks of eligibility index of government employees (applicants) by the Central Selection Board relies on the supervision of the scope of public employees and the dependence of the personal opinions and opinions of civil servants. In order to make such an assessment, the Board's Central Election Committee consciously adopted a policy that officers' integrity and dignity would be considered in order to rely on the personal views and opinions of members, members on civilian integrity and performance. Personal thoughts or opinions of The servants did not keep the record, ie, the officers who served in front of them or were not born from any tang. The board was prepared to carefully review the dossier of officers placed before the Central Selection Board. The collective opinion, but the reasons given for their supremacy were based solely on the personal opinion of the members and it appears that the service dossier was not considered a Central Selection Board, consisting of 12 members from different provinces. And it was hard to imagine. That all members knew about the inability and performance of public servants, therefore, the personal opinion of some of the members, apparently, was left freely without intelligence and without service.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
