Sections 302/109/148/34 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 2 (b) and 7 convictions, speeding, assault with a deadly weapon, determining the suspect's status as a joint intent. At the time of the incident, she was a child in the meaning of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, and that the trial court, while determining the defendant's status as a child, neglected to enter her birth certificate and this result. Concluded that his point of view / physique suggested that the trial court had dealt with the case in a broad way which was against the intention of the legislature which justified Eels Justice System Ordinance section shows 7, 2000 had to deal with minority claims raised by the accused. According to the trial court's section 7 mandate, it was an illegal practice for the trial court not to adopt an appropriate procedure to reach a reasonable conclusion that the trial court's order could not be substantiated. o The extent of the accused was set aside and the court was directed to act under Section 7 of the Judicial Justice System Ordinance 2000 and provided by the Supreme Court in the case reported as Mohammed. Based on the guidelines, decide on the child's status as the accused. Aslam and others v. State and another (PLD 2009 SC 777) accordingly a review application was approved
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
