ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN versus M. FAHEEM HAIDER AND COMPANY THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE, OKARA
Apex Court jurisdiction for recovery of A-VII, R2 section 96 and 100 paisa Scope Trial Court dismisses the case and the first appellate court dismisses the trial court's order dismissing the case in favor of the respondents. ? All the evidence presented by the parties is discussed, while only one document is referenced in it. The respondents said that the document is the only relevant document which was discussed by the appellate court, which has been disclosed from the record entry. Written statement and only one document while it is a matter of record that witnesses and other documents were submitted to the trial court by the parties and the right to appeal against the judgment and decree of the civil court was the legal right and the legality of the litigation Was right Claim the Appellate Judgment after discussing the evidence presented by the parties, the first appellate court did not comply with the requirements of the law maker by the first appellate court in which the first appellate court accepted the defendant's appeal. That resulted in the abortion of justice and, therefore, was not sustainable in the eyes of the law and order. The appellate court was set aside and the matter was referred to the appellate court, accordingly its appeal was allowed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
