Find a Lawyer

ABDUL LATIF versus STATE

Sections 230b (b) and 7 377 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2a) against the Qatel MD and the Commission for the Opposition, the mere presence of the accused in the absence of any indictment of the accused. It was not even appealed to the common understanding that the accused, who was the sister of the other accused, would jointly commit the malpractice or murder, everyone was initially considered innocent, unless they were guilty Don't prove it. And when he was found in some other way and acquitted of the charge, he was again acquitted twice and there was no room for interference in the judgment of evil, because he was neither misguided nor seductive.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN v. M. FAHEEM HAIDER AND COMPANY through Chief Executive, Okara 2012 YLR 1057
• MUHAMMAD YASIN v. Sheikh MUHAMMAD PERVAIZ 2012 CLD 1060
• LIAQAT ALI CHUGTAI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Railways 2012 PLC(CS) 1062
• TAYYAB AHMAD KHAN v. SECRETARY COOPERATIVES 2012 CLC 1067
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. Mst. ZUBAIDA BEGUM 2012 MLD 1069
• MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Health, Islamabad 2012 CLC 1071
• Mst. NOOR BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2012 YLR 1073
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. TREND HOSIERY (PVT.) LTD. 2012 CLD 1078

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

registration advocate from Ziarat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes