Section 498 Statutory Regulation (XLV of 1860), Rules 420/468/471 as a fraudulent and fraudulent fraudulent document, as a forged document, forfeiture of property forfeiture. The FIR was filed with a delay of two years, according to the contents of the agreement between the parties, allegedly Rs 1 crore was paid to the complainant for the purchase of the land in dispute. Such an agreement was executed. There was a civil suit between the parties, where the court had to determine its authenticity and validity if the High Court had committed an offense in the FIR If convicted the accused guilty and sentenced him to sell them the contract would be anumly in this case. To be forged, and on the other hand, the civil court issued a decree specifying the specific performance of the same contract to be a valid and actionable CR in favor of the accused. Illegal proceedings, which would prove useless in such circumstances and a waste of time, were a compelling forum for the civil court's determination of the authenticity of the document and, if there was a question that the documents were not substantiated, they would set it apart. According to the law, the court also enjoyed the jurisdiction to initiate criminal proceedings against the person found guilty of forgery of documents, if it was declared a record of the case, it showed that the complainant, The present case has been filed against them by the money paid by the accused for the seizure. The accused's plea was allowed and his interim bail had already been granted pre-arrest bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
