Find a Lawyer

FATEH DIN versus MUHAMMAD ALI

Article 42 and title 54 Applicants of the Customs (Punjab) applicable to the declaration of title and immunity pending the jurisdiction that the name of the predecessor in the interest of the plaintiff in the change approved at the time of the release of the defendants (? 1947 ation) Was not done because mere change did not create any favor for the party unless it was endorsed by the competent authority. The legal guardian of the plaintiff of the AQE property at the time was entitled to take part in the dispute property, the estate under question was a vacant property, so the customs were not applicable to the said property as the custody was only applicable to the heirs. Appellate court order found no illegal item, review revoked

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• ZAWAR v. State 2012 YLR 1338
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. State 2012 YLR 1342
• IMTIAZ SHARIF v. State 2012 MLD 1342
• Ch. AHSAN AHMAD, JUDGE ACCOUNTABILITY COURT NO.1, LAHORE v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN LAW AND JUSTICE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PLC(CS) 1344
• MUKHTAR AHMAD v. State 2012 YLR 1345
• M. IQBAL BUTT v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1350
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2012 CLC 1361
• Khawaja SHAHBAZ AHMED v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, RANGE OFFICE, GUJRANWALA 2012 PTD 1361

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes