Section 88 88 Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979 1979, 1979), for the purpose of release of the attached property 17/22, the accused applicant in the case was convicted in the case and his agricultural land attached under section 88 of the four canals. Was made, the PCP petition attached was rejected by the trial court for the release of its enclosed property, the objection to the attachment of the property under a non-existent order under section 88, to obtain the attendance of the CCP accused And it was already achieved that the applicant's property was easily enclosed. And no action had been taken yet that the applicant appeared in the trial court within seven days of his conviction, so there was no legal justification for keeping his property attached for an indefinite period of time and The discrimination order was not in accordance with the law and was set aside according to which the property of the accused was accepted by the Petitoo and issued.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
