Article & 63 & 999 Constitution of the Martyrs (of 10 of 1984), Article 38 & 39 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 380 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Theft in residential house etc. Did not agree with the report. On the basis that the accused confessed to the Investigation Officer and the fact was added to the case diary. The Velidity Magistrate needed to examine the report with fairness, and the Magistrate had to go through the material fairly, honestly and honestly. Submitted during the investigation, the evidence found its admissibility and then according to the law, the magistrate failed to do so and relied on the case diary, which the accused allegedly filed with the Investigation Officer. Had confessed to my crime before. The police officer was unacceptable in the evidence under Articles 38 and 39 of the Law Martyrdom, 1984 while disagreeing or disagreeing he should have dismissed the case magistrate who should have gone through all the available evidence collected by the police and his Later the order should have been approved The defamation order was outright illegal and the Judicial Magistrate was instructed to pass this order forward. According to the law, a petition was allowed under it
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
