Appreciating the evidence of sections 302 (b) and 302 (c) Qatil Ahmed, the case was reduced to two versions, one was filed by the prosecution in the FIR and the other was brought to the record by statements of eyewitnesses, and the other Taken by During its investigation, in its statements under the accused and under section 2342, CCPC suspected the presence of four eyewitnesses at the relevant time and according to positive reports from the chemical inspector and serologist, the accused's blood was bleeding. There was no progress in the recovery of the stained baby. Recovery of the prosecutor's case, even otherwise, was not the motive of the evidence as it was alleged by the prosecution that the record of the prosecution was not recorded, thus, denied and under the law of the accused. The statement was accepted without any star testimony. Investigating the incident, the court's witnesses fully supported the defendant's version taken by the accused in his statements under Section 342, CRPC, and concluded that by the investigation O. After the investigation, the accused did not. Conducted a series of sudden outbursts of aggression and forced the victim to confess his sister to his lust; , The accused was not charged under section 302 (b), the PPC was changed to section 302 (c), and his life imprisonment. The sentence was limited to ten years. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
